Bill Gross’s Pimco Total Return ETF (TRXT) set to be ‘bellwether’ active ETF

Feb 29th, 2012 | By | Category: Fixed Income

As of April 4, 2012, the exchange ticker for the Pimco Total Return ETF became BOND. See The name’s BOND: Pimco changes Total Return ETF ticker

The 1 March launch of the actively managed Pimco Total Return ETF (TRXT) will be a bellwether product for the nascent ‘active ETF’ sector, predicts Strategic Insight, a fund data provider. Its success could inspire more firms to launch active ETFs.

Bill Gross’s Pimco Total Return ETF (TRXT) set to be ‘bellwether’ active ETF

The Pimco Total Return ETF (TRXT) will be managed by Bill Gross (pictured) and will pursue the same objectives as Pimco’s Total Return Fund, the largest US mutual fund.

Despite much attention, active ETFs have not yet gained much traction. At the end of January, the US had just $3.7 billion invested in 33 actively managed ETFs – ETFs that do not try to track a benchmark index. That amounted to less than half of one percent of the $1.15 trillion ETF market, according to Strategic Insight data.

Of that $3.7 billion in assets, 48% is in the largest active ETF, the Pimco Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy ETF (MINT), a $1.8 billion fund that is an alternative to money-market funds.

“Pimco’s Total Return ETF will be the first brand-name active ETF with a well-known fund manager behind it, and so it will be an important test case for the potential popularity of the ‘active ETF’ product structure,” says Loren Fox, head of ETF research at Strategic Insight.

“We expect it to easily surpass MINT in its first year to become the largest active ETF. How big TRXT will become remains to be seen.”

The Total Return ETF will be managed by Bill Gross and will pursue the same objectives as Pimco’s Total Return Fund, which is the largest US mutual fund with $250 billion in assets. However, the ETF is not going to be an exact duplicate of the mutual fund. This is because the Total Return Fund has no limits on usage of derivatives (which the fund uses extensively) whereas the Total Return ETF will not be able to use any derivatives except for forwards, and because some strategies may be affected by the requirement that the Total Return ETF, like all current ETFs, must disclose its entire portfolio daily.

“Because Bill Gross can move markets, the Total Return ETF will be the first active ETF that truly risks front-running. If this ETF shows that it can successfully navigate that risk, it should ease some firms’ fears about daily portfolio disclosure in an active ETF – fears that have held some portfolio managers back from considering an active ETF,” says Fox. “A Total Return ETF that grows quickly and avoids front-running could inspire more firms to launch active ETFs. That potential makes TRXT’s 1 March debut the most important US ETF launch of 2012.”

“Many traditional mutual fund firms are eyeing the active ETF space as a possible way to participate in the rapidly growing ETF market. More than two dozen firms have filed papers and are waiting for the SEC approval needed to launch an active ETF, including AllianceBernstein, Dreyfus, Janus, JP Morgan, Legg Mason, T. Rowe Price, Vanguard and others. Pimco’s Total Return ETF could accelerate the urgency of entering the active-ETF space,” Fox says.

Pimco’s Total Return ETF will carry an expense ratio of 55 basis points (bps), lower than the 90 bps expense of Total Return Fund’s A Share Class. It is more expensive than the 46 bps cost of the mutual fund’s Institutional Shares, which hold 60% of the fund’s assets, but the Institutional shares require a $1 million minimum investment. “The Total Return ETF could attract price-conscious small investors. In so doing, the ETF could represent new distribution channels for the strategy,” says Fox.

Tags: , ,

Leave a Comment



More in Fixed Income
Vanguard urges investors to consider impact of fees as ISA season approaches
Vanguard urges investors to consider impact of fees as ISA season approaches

With investors losing far more in 'silent killer' management fees than they gain in ISA tax benefits, investors and advisers are being urged...

Two thirds of IFAs say cost 'most important factor' when choosing passive
Two thirds of IFAs say cost ‘most important factor’ when choosing passive

New research among IFAs by Legal & General Investments has shown that cost is the most important factor when choosing a passive investment...

Close